|
Published: October 8, 2009
I grew up in a diner. My parents have owned and operated
Edelweiss restaurant in Auburn, Calif., for the better part of
30 years. I'm not a restaurant analyst, but I know first-hand
how tough the business can be.
Studies show one in four restaurants close in their first year
of business. Extend that to three years, and the failure rate
rises to three in five.
When that first lease is up, many entrepreneurs realize that the
restaurant business just isn't for them.
Then there are the exceptions that prove the rule: Great
restaurants that really shine. These businesses juggle pleasing
customers, keeping the food consistent, managing vendors,
keeping the staff content, fixing refrigerators and a hundred
other endless jobs.
Easy? No. But the operators who can do it make serious money. So
can their shareholders.
The list of publicly traded U.S. restaurants -- 151 in all --
has a lot of well-known and well-loved restaurants, but many
aren't making money.
Some are growing, but slowly, suggesting they may have reached
the saturation point. McDonald's, as an extreme example, has so
many U.S. stores that Americans are never more than 107 miles
from one. There's always overseas, of course, though a lot of
those markets have already been tapped.
Of the 151 restaurants listed on U.S. exchanges, only 68 have a
market cap of more than $5 million. That's a teeny company in
the big scheme of things, but it's Nasdaq's minimum, and for
now, it's a decent starting point.
Next, let's weed out restaurants that have negative revenue
growth for the past year. We want to see companies that have
begun to grow, not some mom and pop -- like my mom's and my
pop's -- that are happy with a few locations.
Having assured ourselves of top-line growth, we now look to the
bottom line at earnings per share. We want to see growth. We
don't just want more locations, we want more profitable
locations. Tasty stocks doesn't translate into tasty burgers.
The inverse is also true.
After sifting through market cap,
revenue and earnings data, we've
narrowed the list from 151 to nine:
|
Company
|
Ticker |
|
Tim Horton's |
THI |
|
Peet's Coffee & Tea |
PEET |
|
Buffalo Wild Wings |
BWLD |
|
Panera Bread |
PNRA |
|
Nathan's Famous |
NATH |
|
Texas Roadhouse |
TXRH |
|
BJ's Restaurants |
BJRI |
|
Chipotle |
CMG |
|
Rubio's Restaurant |
RUBO |
These are all good operators. Now let's find out which one is
the best.
I tightened the screen and excluded companies with less than
20% EPS and revenue growth during the past year. I eliminated
any company with a forward P/E above 20, a price-to-book ratio
above below 4.0, and excluded restaurants with a net profit
margin of less than 5%.
Three companies remained: Buffalo Wild Wings, Panera Bread
and Nathan's Famous.
The raw data shows these three restaurants to be the best in
the business. Of the three, Buffalo Wild Wings is the clear
winner. The chain combines chicken, beer and sports on TV. In
fact, Nathan Slaughter profiled the company in depth in his most
recent issue of Half-Priced Stocks. To learn more,
click here.
-- Anthony Haddad
Staff Writer
StreetAuthority.com |