|
Published: March 1, 2010
A friend just forwarded me an email from
the editors of Mother Earth News, an eco-centric DIY magazine,
compiling some of their favorite stories from the publication's
past 40 years. Those snowbound in the mid-Atlantic may
appreciate imagining a little revenge on Punxsutawney Phil by
reading the how-to-serve-groundhog feature from 1984, while the
morbidly frugal may want to bone up on a 2003 feature on
building your own coffin ("it makes a great coffee table or
storage trunk before its final use").
Those with a green bent, like me, can enjoy a good selection on
alternative fueling options for cars. In 1981, when a gallon of
gasoline cost an inflation-adjusted $3.23, the magazine ran a
lengthy feature on converting a pickup truck to run on wood
chips, through the addition of a wood gasification system to
your engine. Though not very sporty looking (part of the system
includes a converted 40-gallon water heater tank), it got about
a mile for every pound of wood scrap and tree trimmings.
A 1971 feature details how an English farm dweller turned a
combination of pig and chicken poop into a source of cheap and
cleaner-than-gasoline source of methane to run his car.
Most impressive was a 1979 feature on how one American converted
his Opel sportscar into a hybrid over the course of a few
weekends and evenings using commonly available parts. The
resulting converted car, with the same curb weight, got 75
miles-per-gallon! The car was even given the regenerative
breaking the Toyota Prius boasts, with none of the breaking
trouble, I presume.
Most of us don't have the time or the inclination to tinker with
our car engines to make them run on another fuel. But we don't
have to anymore. While biofuels used to be an endeavor for
hobbyists and hippies, they are fast becoming the core of a
multibillion-dollar industry.
Most of us in the U.S. are familiar with one type of bio fuel:
corn-based ethanol, which for years was seen more as an excuse
to send political pork to Mid-Western farmers rather than
serious policy. The Energy Independence and Security Act of
December 2007 gave biofuels a huge boost by mandating that the
country use 36 billion gallons of ethanol by 2020, up from seven
billion when the bill was passed (the nation uses a total of 120
billion gallons of gasoline annually).
Just this month, the EPA gave another boost by determining that
corn-based ethanol provides a net 21% reduction in greenhouse
gases over gasoline, meaning corn-based ethanol can qualify as
an "advanced biofuel" under favorable federal regulations. That
will help justify a proposed increase for later this year in the
allowable blend of ethanol in gasoline from a voluntary 10% to
15%.
Those three facts alone should make investors sit up and take
notice. After all, how often do you come across an industry with
a federal mandate to quadruple its market by the end of this
decade, that is receiving active support now in expanding that
market plus is found to get the country further along the goal
of cutting greenhouse gases?
But investing in biofuels stocks isn't a slam-dunk.
Ethanol-related stocks got a huge boost in early 2008 after the
EISA was passed, but by the middle of that year, criticisms of
the effect of ethanol on the price of food supplies reached a
crescendo, and the market turmoil added to the pressure on
biofuels producers. Some that had been seen as good bets, like
#2 ethanol producer VeraSun, went under and saw its assets sold
off at a fraction of their value to refiners like Valero
(NYSE: VLO).
Yet lately, we're seeing increasing strength in the shares of
the surviving ethanol-related companies. Commodity broker
Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE: ADM) has used the weakness to
build up its position as an ethanol refiner, building its own
plants and buying up other capacity. It's now the largest
producer in the country, and is in a position of strength if
gasoline prices surge and demand for ethanol materializes.
Similarly, second-tier ethanol players that survived the worst
of it, like The Andersons (Nasdaq: ANDE), are seeing good
relative performance lately, too.
But in this environment, I'm not sold on investing in any
domestic ethanol producer just yet. There are a few reasons for
that. Let me talk about the macro ones I believe could drive
long-term movement in ethanol.
One is the global economic uncertainty: The debt troubles of
Greece, Spain and other countries in Europe have increased the
risk of the common euro currency taking a beating. And if
investors flee the euro, that almost certainly means the dollar
will strengthen. And when the dollar strengthens, there is a
strong inclination of oil prices to fall. That's because oil is
priced globally in dollars, meaning OPEC can ease its pricing to
placate its best customer (us) while still going home with as
much money in their own currency as always. (It's no coincidence
that 10 years ago 99-cent gas coincided with the unrivalled
strength of the U.S. dollar.) If oil prices drop, ethanol is a
lot less attractive to refiners, retailers and ultimately us
drivers.
Another reason I'm not convinced about domestic ethanol just
yet is the concern that using up edible crops (or at least
arable land to grow inedible, ethanol-producing corn) will spark
another wave of outrage if food prices spike again domestically.
And that is a significant possibility if the dollar doesn't
strengthen and the U.S. middle class continues to get squeezed
from all directions.
Food supply shocks like that are also why China mandates that no
biofuels in its country be derived from edible crops. The
leading biodiesel maker there, Gushan Environmental (NYSE:
GU), collects waste cooking oil for restaurants for its
product and eventually will make fuel from a non-edible
pistachio plant that grows well on land otherwise unsuited for
farming.
Lastly, perhaps the primary reason I'm wary of domestic ethanol
stocks is that I expect Brazil will be the most effective
ethanol producer. For one, Brazil is the dominant grower of
sugarcane in the world, producing about one-third of all cane.
Ethanol can be made from sugarcane, and in fact cane is a
superior raw material for ethanol, since more of it converts
into energy, and does so more easily. By one measure, sugarcane
ethanol returns eight times the energy used to produce it, while
corn ethanol returns just 1.3 times the energy used to make it.
Now add in the fact Brazil not only exports a lot of sugar, but
also makes a lot of ethanol too.
In 2009, Brazil is estimated to have produced 28 billion gallons
of ethanol. Most of that was used domestically, accounting for
half of Brazilian automobile fuel. But exporting it to markets
that offer a greater return, like the United States directly, or
through intermediary countries that sidestep trade barriers, is
hardly unrealistic. And if you project an export market for
American ethanol, consider that it is China and Brazil which
have just inked a deal to start sending Brazilian ethanol east.
In this environment, I'm putting the odds favoring a company
called Cosan (NYSE: CZZ), the largest sugar producer in
Brazil and also the biggest ethanol producer. The company just
signed a deal with Royal Dutch Shell for co-generation and
marketing of each other's fuels in a bid to lay the groundwork
for a global ethanol giant.
CZZ has more than doubled in the past year, jumping from $4 to
nearly $9, giving it a market cap of $2.8 billion, and it has
held up well in the recent market retracement.
Cosan should also benefit from strong prices in the world market
for raw sugar this year too (Brazil sells its crop into the
world market this summer). I don't think it's time to buy it
just yet, and commodity-based stocks can be very volatile, but
if you're interested in profiting from biofuels, keep your gaze
to the south.
-- Brendan Coffey
Editor
Cabot Green Investor
|