|
Published: September 28, 2010
If you had a crystal
ball in the 1960s, you probably would have seen that Japan would
turn out to be a great investment. The country's economy was
growing nicely, family birth rates were high enough to ensure a
young workforce, its education system was excellent, its
currency was cheap and it was generally regarded as ranking high
in terms of lack of corruption. The Japanese stock market did
great for two decades, rising +178% in the 1970s and an
eye-popping +587% in the 1980s.
Of course, some of those
metrics (such as a cheap currency and high birth rates) stopped
being a positive factor years ago, and my help explain why
Japan's Nikkei Index fell -51% in the 1990s and another -49% in
this last decade. (It plunged from 38916 at the end of 1989 to a
recent 9600. Yikes).
Such a rare confluence of positive factors such as Japan had in
the 1970s and 1980s rarely exists. These days, countries with
strong education systems are often found in the developed world,
where population growth rates have cooled. In other places,
stock markets may look like relative bargains, but corruption
concerns should keep you far away.
So your preference in international markets is largely a factor
of what you consider to be important. For example, many
investors will only put their money in countries that have a
history of clean and transparent business climates. And for good
reason. The Heritage Foundation has historically found a tight
correlation with strong market returns and low national
corruption. The organization produces an annual "Freedom Index"
that highlights the best places to do business. Here's the
latest snapshot:
|
Freedom Index |
|
Country |
Rank* |
Birth Rate** |
|
Hong Kong |
1 |
F |
|
Singapore |
2 |
F |
|
Australia |
3 |
C |
|
New Zealand |
4 |
B |
|
Ireland |
5 |
B |
|
Switzerland |
6 |
D |
|
Canada |
7 |
D |
|
U.S. |
8 |
B |
|
Denmark |
9 |
C |
|
Chile |
10 |
B |
|
U.K. |
11 |
B |
|
Netherlands |
12 |
D |
|
Japan |
13 |
F |
|
Sweden |
14 |
D |
|
Germany |
15 |
C |
|
* only includes countries with suitably-sized stock
markets. Source: Heritage Foundation |
|
** ranks A-F relative to birth rate percentile.
Source: CIA Factbook |
|
I cross-referenced these high-ranking countries with their
respective birth rates. The greatest enemy of long-term growth
is a shrinking population that yields fewer younger workers
supporting a rising tide of retiring workers. Of these least
corrupt countries, only New Zealand, Ireland, the United States
and Chile are having enough children to avoid the retiree crunch
(immigration policies notwithstanding).
Before we move on, there is an important secondary corollary to
this table. New Zealand, Ireland, Canada and Chile are all
adjacent to strong economic regions or trading partners, and
their growth can be sustained through exports even if their
domestic markets are small. For example, Australia is blessed
with massive natural resources and high growth rates -- just the
right environment for neighboring New Zealand, which has a
comparatively weaker currency and could increasingly become an
export powerhouse to Australia.
Get schooled
To establish sustainable long-term growth rates, countries need
to develop well-educated middle classes, and not just
Harvard-educated elites. The fact that Korea ranks high in math
and science is a big factor in explaining that country's solid
economic growth during the past decade. In the developed world,
Canada and New Zealand score quite high in terms of education
standards. And as noted, they are fortunate to have larger
trading partners right at their door.
|
Education Attainment |
|
Country |
Reading Rank |
Math
Rank |
Science Rank |
Total
Score |
|
Korea |
1 |
2 |
7 |
10 |
|
Canada |
3 |
5 |
2 |
10 |
|
New Zealand |
4 |
7 |
4 |
15 |
|
Netherlands |
9 |
3 |
6 |
18 |
|
Australia |
6 |
9 |
5 |
20 |
|
Japan |
12 |
6 |
3 |
21 |
|
Switzerland |
11 |
4 |
11 |
26 |
|
Ireland |
5 |
16 |
14 |
35 |
|
Germany |
14 |
14 |
8 |
36 |
|
Sweden |
8 |
15 |
16 |
39 |
|
U.K. |
13 |
19 |
9 |
41 |
|
Poland |
7 |
20 |
18 |
45 |
|
France |
18 |
18 |
20 |
56 |
|
Spain |
27 |
25 |
24 |
76 |
|
Italy |
25 |
29 |
28 |
82 |
|
Russia |
30 |
26 |
32 |
88 |
|
Turkey |
29 |
31 |
31 |
91 |
|
Mexico |
31 |
32 |
33 |
96 |
|
Brazil |
32 |
33 |
33 |
98 |
|
Note: OED members only. No U.S. data available.
Source: OECD |
|
TOTAL SCORE = The lower, the better. |
|
Chasing momentum
The global economic crisis of 2008 and 2009 has led to a
slowdown in economic growth. But some countries were able to see
their economies expand at a rapid pace in 2009. The table below
highlights the world's fastest-growing economies, and it's no
surprise that they are mostly located in Asia and Latin America,
where rising middle classes are fueling a virtuous cycle of
further spending gains.
|
Fastest Growing Economies (2009)* |
|
China |
+9.8% |
|
Argentina |
+7.1% |
|
Egypt |
+6.9% |
|
India |
+6.6% |
|
Vietnam |
+6.2% |
|
Indonesia |
+6.1% |
|
Russia |
+6.0% |
|
Brazil |
+5.2% |
|
Poland |
+4.8% |
|
Chile |
+4.0% |
|
Israel |
+3.9% |
|
Colombia |
+3.5% |
|
*Includes only countries with suitably-sized stock
markets. Source: CIA Factbook |
|
Historically speaking, fast-growing economies can maintain their
momentum for quite some time, especially when key trading
partners are growing in tandem. It's no coincidence that
Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Colombia all made this list. All of
these countries feed off of each other and (with the arguable
exception of Argentina) are also benefiting from far sounder
fiscal policies that encourage growth and inhibit inflation.
Now, let's see how those economic growth rates have translated
into stock market returns this year for those same countries:
|
2010 Year-to-Date Stock Market Return* |
|
China |
-19% |
|
Argentina |
+5% |
|
Egypt |
+5% |
|
India |
+4% |
|
Vietnam |
-7% |
|
Indonesia |
+25% |
|
Russia |
N/A |
|
Brazil |
-2% |
|
Poland |
+4% |
|
Chile |
+29% |
|
Israel |
0% |
|
Colombia |
+21% |
|
*Through the first 8 months of the year. Source:
Bespoke Investment Group |
|
Several of these countries were discussed in my analysis of
the CIVETs, thought by some to be the new hot investment area
after the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China).
As I noted in the article, countries like Colombia are quite
appealing, but after a strong run they are no bargain. If one
were to disregard relative valuations, then places like Chile,
Indonesia and Colombia would look far more appealing.
The Big Mac Index
Of course, a country's competitiveness is tied to its currency,
as Chinese government bureaucrats would likely note. Japan was
blessed with a cheap currency 20 to 40 years ago. More recently,
its currency has strengthened, which partially explains why the
Nikkei has shed -70% of its value in the last 20 years.
Every year, The Economist takes a look at the price of a Big Mac
to gauge the relative strength of a country's currency. Looking
at those same countries in the last table (below), you'll note
that a Big Mac can be had for a low price in Russia, Poland and
China. It's an inexact gauge, as the cost of Big Macs is also a
function of taxes, local sourcing and other variables. But it's
no coincidence that a Big Mac is relatively expensive in places
like Colombia and Israel. The cost of doing business in those
countries is fairly high, and they must compete in the global
economy on the basis of an educated workforce and/or an
abundance of natural resources.
|
Price of a Big Mac ($U.S.) |
|
China |
$1.97 |
|
Argentina |
$3.75 |
|
Egypt |
$3.48 |
|
India |
N/A |
|
Vietnam |
N/A |
|
Indonesia |
$2.51 |
|
Russia |
$2.31 |
|
Brazil |
$2.33 |
|
Poland |
$2.22 |
|
Chile |
$3.52 |
|
Israel |
$3.99 |
|
Colombia |
$4.46 |
|
Source: The Economist |
|
|
Action to Take --> In
many respects, it pays to focus on the "proximity plays," or
those countries that sit adjacent to larger economies, yet
possess their own set of considerable skills. So New Zealand is
a solid play on Australia. Hong Kong stands to benefit from
ever-rising prospects in China. Chile sits a stone's throw away
from Brazil. Canada has a big neighbor just to the south.
Just as important, these countries grade out very well in terms
of corruption and educational attainment. You can invest in
those countries through exchange-traded funds such as iShares
New Zealand (NYSE: ENZL), iShares Hong Kong (NYSE: EWH), iShares
Chile (NYSE: ECH) or iShares Canada (NYSE: EWC).
-- David Sterman
Staff Writer
StreetAuthority
P.S. -- When you get in on the ground floor of a
promising new trend or technology, the profits that can follow
can change your life forever. Andy Obermueller’s
Game-Changing Stocks is entirely devoted to
finding the next big, life-changing investing idea. See his
latest report,
The Hottest Investment Opportunities of 2011, for
more ground-breaking investment plays. |